The ongoing arguments about casino gambling are invariably based from two points of view: the regeneration benefits of new jobs and revenues for an area versus the increase in crime. Problem gambling does not really enter the argument as no one can dispute that where there is gambling there are problem gamblers – the only points of contention are in disagreements over whether a few should prevent the many from enjoying gaming, and whether the effects are as severe or as long-term as some insist.

Opening a casino does create jobs, but only 5% more than in non-casino areas. Revenues and spending in cities and towns with casinos are similar to those without, and increase by similar amounts. After a casino starts operation there is more crime, but only because the population grows – the crime rate actually declines. However, house prices are approximately $6,000 higher than in counties without casinos, probably with the increased demand from population growth.

The co-authors of the report suggest that future gaming debates should stop focussing on crime and revenues, “Employment, finances and crime are insufficient rationales for deciding whether or not to allow casinos”. Doubtless the pro and anti gambling lobbies would still find plenty to argue about, even with these removed from the equation. (E-01.14.05)

© Copyright 2005 CasinoCompendium



>>> return to archives
>>> return to frontpage